<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kenneth Lim &#124; Out of Officer &#187; execution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kennethlim.net/tag/execution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kennethlim.net</link>
	<description>Next Generation Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Quid Pro Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/quid-pro-quo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/quid-pro-quo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moonfruit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[squarespace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is part rant, part case study. Lately, I’ve been extremely annoyed by two campaigns on Twitter. The first campaign was by Squarespace. They asked people to use the hash tag #squarespace in their tweets. People could do this randomly and were encouraged to do it as often as possible. Squarespace would select a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is part rant, part case study. Lately, I’ve been extremely annoyed by two campaigns on Twitter.</p>
<p>The first campaign was by <a href="http://www.squarespace.com/" target="_blank">Squarespace</a>. They asked people to use the hash tag #squarespace in their tweets. People could do this randomly and were encouraged to do it as often as possible. Squarespace would select a lucky winner every day and give that person a gift voucher for the Apple Store.</p>
<p>The second campaign was by <a href="http://www.moonfruit.com/" target="_blank">Moonfruit</a>. It was a similar campaign where, during a week, people could enter a competition to win one Apple MacBook Pro each day. People were automatically entered into the competition if they used the hash tag #moonfruit in their tweets and again, people were stimulated to do it as often as possible.</p>
<p>These brands have succeeded in getting their brand names into the social media space, but it’s been done in a dubious way. Moreover, they haven’t performed any true form of consumer engagement, which just means that they let people flood Twitter with their brand name without any proper context.</p>
<p>Don’t use social media as a cheap promotional tool. Use social media to genuine build relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/quid-pro-quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dialing The Social Media Police</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/dialing-the-social-media-police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/dialing-the-social-media-police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engaging in social media is a risky activity. You never know what to expect from your audience. They can rave about you, but they can just as well cause you the big problems that seriously affect your image. The risk can never be eliminated and the consequences have to be expected, but there are two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engaging in social media is a risky activity. You never know what to expect from your audience. They can rave about you, but they can just as well cause you the big problems that seriously affect your image. The risk can never be eliminated and the consequences have to be expected, but there are two must-dos that mitigate the risk.</p>
<ol>
<li>Preparation:      Before embarking on social media activities, you should have scouted out      your audience. How social media savvy are they? How large is the audience?      What is the level their clout? What typical conversations (about your      brand) are already taking place? Et cetera. Finding the answers to these      questions helps you determine whether the audience is willing and able to      embrace you within the social media space. It helps you fine-tune your      expectations, priorities and going-in position.</li>
<li>Policy:      Create a social media policy for those who will be involved. This creates      clarity on what can and what cannot be done while engaging in social      media. Prepare not only general guidelines for everyday social media      activities but also prepare specific guidelines for special occasions such      as publicity dramas and compromised accounts (hackers).</li>
</ol>
<p>Know what to do when going in. Know what to do once you’re in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/dialing-the-social-media-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consolidation Is The New Distribution</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/consolidation-is-the-new-distribution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/consolidation-is-the-new-distribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New social media tools seem to be launching every day. There are different tools that do different things. There are also different tools that do the same thing. It’s difficult to keep an overview of what’s new and what’s useful. The downside of spreading activities over multiple platforms is that you risk losing control of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New social media tools seem to be launching every day. There are different tools that do different things. There are also different tools that do the same thing. It’s difficult to keep an overview of what’s new and what’s useful. The downside of spreading activities over multiple platforms is that you risk losing control of your content. Moreover, people won’t know where to find you and your content.</p>
<p>However, the importance is focus. By focusing your content on a handful of platforms that meet your content distribution criteria, you take (back) control of your content. Understand how each platform contributes to your social media goals and objectives and select the appropriate ones. The power of social media is that your users will spread your content to other platforms for you.</p>
<p>Focus on the most valuable tools. Take control of your content. Let social media do your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/consolidation-is-the-new-distribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Little More Conversation And A Little More Action Please</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/a-little-more-conversation-and-a-little-more-action-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/a-little-more-conversation-and-a-little-more-action-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s good to listen to consumers and it’s good to talk to consumers, both online and offline. But as they, talk is cheap. The conversation factor can have a positive effect on your brand image, but it doesn’t always drive the bottom line (and consequently shareholder value). If you don’t know why you’re entering the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s good to listen to consumers and it’s good to talk to consumers, both online and offline. But as they, talk is cheap. The conversation factor can have a positive effect on your brand image, but it doesn’t always drive the bottom line (and consequently shareholder value). If you don’t know why you’re entering the conversation, stop talking.</p>
<p>The conversation requires proper preparation. Set clear objectives on what you’d like achieve with the conversation. Document the required and invested resources. Measure the outcomes. Evaluate your outcomes versus your objectives and determine your return.</p>
<p>If the return is positive, then that’s great. Continue to engage in the conversation, look where you can improve your return and execute those ideas. If the return is negative, reevaluate your approach by changing variables like tone, content and frequency. Don’t be afraid to pull the plug if results aren’t positive but aim for improvement first.</p>
<p>Plan the conversation you intend to have. Turn conversation into conversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/a-little-more-conversation-and-a-little-more-action-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opaque Transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/opaque-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/opaque-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authenticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online customer reviews are one of the developments that have raised the popularity of social media. Many retailers offer customers the option to write and read reviews about the products they sell. Customer reviews form a great complement to professional reviews. Whereas professional reviews can tell us how good a product is to use, customer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online customer reviews are one of the developments that have raised the popularity of social media. Many retailers offer customers the option to write and read reviews about the products they sell. Customer reviews form a great complement to professional reviews. Whereas professional reviews can tell us how good a product is to use, customer reviews can tell us how good a product is to own—and—how good the retailer is.</p>
<p>There is risk involved though. One recent case involved <a href="http://www.thedailybackground.com/2009/01/19/fresh-evidence-suggests-bekins-amazon-sales-rep-was-engaged-in-more-unethical-activities/" target="_blank">Belkin’s representative of Amazon.com</a>. Mr Bayard not only offered to pay customers $0.65 per positive review of Belkin, he also wrote positive reviews himself using pseudonyms.</p>
<p>Social media can make a lot of a company’s marketing more transparent, but cases like these make it a false sense of transparency. I hope that companies take an ethical point of view when dealing with customer reviews, but there will be exceptions unfortunately.</p>
<p>There might be more than meets the eye. Be critical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/opaque-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good To Great To Gone: Circuit City</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/good-to-great-to-gone-circuit-city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/good-to-great-to-gone-circuit-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circuit city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[objectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who have read Jim Collins’ book &#8220;Good to Great&#8221; (Amazon link), you’ll remember that Circuit City was used as one of the select examples of “good to great” companies. If you haven’t read the book, I can definitely recommend it. Circuit City basically dominated the stock market—beating average performance by 22 times at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who have read Jim Collins’ book &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0066620996?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=kln-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0066620996">Good to Great</a>&#8221; (Amazon link), you’ll remember that Circuit City was used as one of the select examples of “good to great” companies. If you haven’t read the book, I can definitely recommend it.</p>
<p>Circuit  City basically dominated the stock market—beating average performance by 22 times at its height—for a 15+ year period. However, one of the key traits of a “great” company is that it’s able to withstand setbacks, whether personnel-wise, economic or other. This hasn’t been the case with Circuit  City as it closed its doors last week after filing for bankruptcy in late 2008. This obviously baffled me and I’ve tried to find answers to how this happened. In the end, it boiled down to losing the competitive advantage:</p>
<ul>
<li>Their      branding model didn’t work anymore. The goal of Circuit City      was to become the best at service, selection, savings and satisfaction.      However, other market players had mastered one or multiple of these      categories in a better way than Circuit       City: Best Buy      (service and selection), WalMart (savings) and Amazon.com (satisfaction).      As a result, Circuit       City failed to gain      a competitive edge.</li>
<li>Circuit City had a tradition of paying      their employees well and training them to deliver the best possible      service, but cost cutting procedures led to stripping sales commissions      from sales staff and eventually to layoffs of these well-paid and      knowledgeable employees. This also hurt their competitive advantage.</li>
<li>The      economic recession wasn’t a key driver but it does magnify the effects and      was strong enough to push Circuit       City over the edge.</li>
</ul>
<p>In essence, Circuit  City destroyed its business by destroying the underlying foundation on which it was built and failing to reinvent itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/good-to-great-to-gone-circuit-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media And Your Customer Contact Cycle</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-and-your-customer-contact-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-and-your-customer-contact-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With every product/service you’re marketing, selling and servicing, you’ll have a customer contact cycle. The customer contact cycle consists of touch points that represent moments of interaction (contact) with your consumer. There are roughly four stages: Awareness: When a consumer is first exposed to your product. Examples are reading a review or seeing an ad. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With every product/service you’re marketing, selling and servicing, you’ll have a customer contact cycle. The customer contact cycle consists of touch points that represent moments of interaction (contact) with your consumer. There are roughly four stages:</p>
<ul>
<li>Awareness:      When a consumer is first exposed to your product. Examples are reading a      review or seeing an ad.</li>
<li>Interest:      When a consumer becomes interested in purchasing your product/service.      Examples are visiting the shop or trying out the product.</li>
<li>Purchase:      When a consumer buys your product/service.</li>
<li>Service      / Re-Purchase / Renewal: When a consumer comes back with a problem or with      an intention to re-purchase/renew.</li>
</ul>
<p>Social media provides new opportunities to enhance the customer contact cycle with new customer touch points. Using tools like Facebook and Twitter, it’s possible to have a continuously open channel with customers. Leverage social media as customer touch points to increase interaction with current and prospective customers, create an open brand image and enable cross-selling and up-selling.</p>
<p>Take advantage of social media to enhance your customer contact cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-and-your-customer-contact-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Is The MMA Of Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-is-the-mma-of-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-is-the-mma-of-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Mixed Martial Arts (MMA). While some people see MMA bouts as glorified cock fights, I can appreciate the idea behind it. MMA is what it says it is: a blend of various martial arts. In the same way, social media can be seen as a blend of various diverse technologies, such as publishing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Mixed Martial Arts (MMA). While some people see MMA bouts as glorified cock fights, I can appreciate the idea behind it. MMA is what it says it is: a blend of various martial arts.</p>
<p>In the same way, social media can be seen as a blend of various diverse technologies, such as publishing platforms, social networks, web applications and search. Being a proficient social media practitioner requires mastery of multiple disciplines.</p>
<p>Are you a black belt? Go through the various social media disciplines. See where you can sharpen your skills to improve overall performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/social-media-is-the-mma-of-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Is There Anybody Out There?</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/hello-is-there-anybody-out-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/hello-is-there-anybody-out-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you’re broadcasting messages to people, do they listen? Do they respond to your ads, do they click on your links, do read your newsletters, et cetera? If the results are underwhelming, try some of these approaches: Content: Rewrite the content to be more about them than about you. While messages should cover what you’re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you’re broadcasting messages to people, do they listen? Do they respond to your ads, do they click on your links, do read your newsletters, et cetera? If the results are underwhelming, try some of these approaches:</p>
<ul>
<li>Content:      Rewrite the content to be more about them than about you. While messages      should cover what you’re promoting, they should also emphasize the      benefits to users. Scrutinize your content and check whether its relevance      is high enough for your audience.</li>
<li>Form:      Experiment with different types of headlines to different audiences. The      headline of a press release should catch the attention of a journalist,      but at the same time, it might not be enticing enough for a consumer. Play      with the layout and the use of images to make your message more attractive      or reader-friendly. Make use of consumer (eye-tracking) studies to see what      areas should be focused.</li>
</ul>
<p>Don’t be afraid to throw spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/hello-is-there-anybody-out-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolution of Content</title>
		<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/the-evolution-of-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kennethlim.net/the-evolution-of-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Lim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[execution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kennethlim.net/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve come a long way in how content is being presented. Whereas content used to be published by predominantly professionals, consumers are now able to publish content themselves. The form of content has also evolved from a more broadcasting-oriented form to a more dialogue-oriented form. Traditional media, such as TV stations and print publishers, are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve come a long way in how content is being presented. Whereas content used to be published by predominantly professionals, consumers are now able to publish content themselves. The form of content has also evolved from a more broadcasting-oriented form to a more dialogue-oriented form.</p>
<p>Traditional media, such as TV stations and print publishers, are seeing consumption decline as consumers choose consume their content from a more diverse set of channels. Traditional media agencies, such as advertising agencies and PR agencies, are scrambling to keep up and justify their value/existence/involvement. Sometimes, the old business models won’t work in this new day and age, sometimes the talent isn’t available to deal with new media forms or the current regime is reluctant to change or in denial about the consequences. None of these are good reasons to continue “business as usual”. The world is changing and it requires a new approach.</p>
<p>Start preparing yourself to cope with the evolution of content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kennethlim.net/the-evolution-of-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
